Pulitzer Prize for History Winner

The Fiery Trial: Abraham Lincoln and American Slavery

by Eric Foner

Summary

Eric Foner traces Abraham Lincoln's changing views on slavery across his entire political life in The Fiery Trial, beginning with his early encounters with the institution in Kentucky and Indiana and following him through a career built on caution rather than the moral certainty later generations projected onto him. Foner shows a young Lincoln who opposed slavery's expansion but avoided open conflict with slaveholders, who supported colonization, the movement to resettle freed Black Americans outside the United States, well into his presidency, and who resisted abolitionist pressure for years out of concern for holding together a fragile political coalition.

The book follows the war years as the pressure of military necessity, not a fixed plan, pushed Lincoln toward emancipation, tracing his evolving proclamations and eventual embrace of Black soldiers in the Union Army as steps that reshaped his own thinking as much as the nation's policy. Foner treats Lincoln's willingness to change, rather than any early, hidden commitment to abolition, as the book's central subject, following a president who arrived at his most famous conviction gradually, under pressure, and in public view.

Foner writes as one of the leading historians of slavery and Reconstruction, and reading the book means following a genuinely evidence based account of political growth rather than a hagiography, one willing to show Lincoln's slower, more hesitant early positions alongside where he eventually arrived. Foner lets the contradictions stand rather than smoothing them away, showing a Lincoln who could hold colonization and eventual emancipation as live options within the same year rather than following a straight path toward the Emancipation Proclamation from the start. It suits a reader who wants Lincoln's reputation as the Great Emancipator tested against the documentary record rather than simply repeated.

Historical Context & Significance

Foner won the 2011 Pulitzer Prize for History, ahead of finalists Stephanie McCurry's Confederate Reckoning: Power and Politics in the Civil War South and Michael J. Rawson's Eden on the Charles: The Making of Boston. The book also won the Bancroft Prize and the Lincoln Prize the same year.

Fellow historian James M. McPherson praised Foner's balance, fairness and depth in tracing Lincoln's trajectory of change, while Washington Post reviewer Fred Kaplan argued more critically that Lincoln mainly responded to circumstance rather than genuinely growing. The book was Foner's twenty second, capping decades of work on slavery and Reconstruction, and it remains one of the most widely cited studies of how Lincoln's actual position on slavery evolved rather than sprang fully formed from his early career.