The Coming of the War, 1914
by Bernadotte E. Schmitt
Summary
Bernadotte Schmitt's two volume The Coming of the War, 1914 reconstructs the diplomatic crisis that turned the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo into a general European war within five weeks, tracing the ultimatums, mobilizations, and alliance obligations that pulled Austria Hungary, Germany, Russia, France, and Britain into the conflict one after another during July and early August 1914. Schmitt built the book from the diplomatic documents that European governments had begun publishing in the years after the war, using them to reconstruct exactly which government made which decision, and when, during the crisis's final weeks.
The book's central argument put Schmitt at the center of a bitter scholarly dispute over who actually caused the war: where revisionist historians of the 1920s had argued that Serbia and Russia bore as much responsibility as Germany and Austria Hungary, Schmitt concluded that Germany had indeed been largely responsible for the catastrophe, backing Austria Hungary's aggressive response to Sarajevo and failing to restrain the crisis when restraint might still have prevented a general war. That conclusion made the book the leading statement of what became known as the orthodox school on the war's origins, directly opposed to the revisionist position associated with the historian Sidney Fay.
Reading the book means following a genuinely contested historical argument made with the diplomatic record laid out week by week, not a settled verdict but one side of a debate that would keep running for decades afterward. It suits a reader interested in how five weeks of diplomatic decisions, made by officials who mostly did not want a general war, produced one anyway, and in how historians have argued ever since about who bears the blame.
Historical Context & Significance
The Coming of the War, 1914 won the 1931 Pulitzer Prize for History after already receiving the American Historical Association's George Louis Beer Prize in 1930, honors that established Schmitt's book as the leading American statement on World War One's origins. Schmitt built his career at the University of Chicago, where he taught modern European history from 1924 to 1946, and served as the first editor of the Journal of Modern History from its founding in 1929.
Schmitt's argument for German responsibility defined what historians came to call the orthodox school of war guilt scholarship, standing against the revisionist position associated with Sidney Fay that spread responsibility more broadly among the great powers. That debate continued for three more decades until the German historian Fritz Fischer's 1961 work brought new archival evidence and fresh analytical approaches to the question, reopening a dispute Schmitt's book had helped define. Schmitt later served as president of the American Historical Association in 1960, and grants supporting international historical research still carry his name today.